Back to Intel

Intel Node

Updating the taxonomy of failure modes in agentic AI systems: What a year of red teaming taught us

mediumvulnerability2026-06-04T19:14:42+00:00source excerpt
vulnerabilitycve

Source excerpt · The upstream feed supplied only part of this article.Read the original source →

A surge in real-world attacks against agentic AI systems is reshaping how we think about risk. Based on 12 months of red teaming, this update introduces seven new failure modes, from supply chain compromise to goal hijacking, and the practical mitigations teams need now. The post Updating the taxonomy of failure modes in agentic AI systems: What a year of red teaming taught us appeared first on Microsoft Security Blog .

In this article Why the Taxonomy Needed Updating Seven new failure modes Operational findings: What red teaming showed New mitigations What to do this quarter When the Microsoft AI Red Team published the Taxonomy of Failure Modes in Agentic AI Systems in April 2025, the goal was a shared vocabulary for a threat landscape that did not fit existing frameworks. The v1. 0 taxonomy was largely forward-looking, built on practitioner interviews, cross-company threat modeling, and our own early operational experience.

It identified novel failure modes unique to agentic systems (agent compromise, injection, impersonation, flow manipulation) alongside existing failure modes materially amplified in agentic contexts (memory poisoning, cross-domain prompt injection, human-in-the-loop bypass). Twelve months later, the evidence base has shifted enough to warrant a v2. 0 .

Read Original Source